The Outcomes of Pilon Fracture Treatment: Primary Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Twostage Approach
Authors
Abstract:
Background: Pilon fracture is one of the challenging injuries in orthopedic surgery. Associated soft tissue injury is animportant factor in choosing treatment options. Two major methods of treatment are considered as one-stage openreduction internal fixation (ORIF) and two-stage treatment (primary external fixation and secondary ORIF). The latter ismost accepted in literature. In the current study, we compared the results of these two methods.Methods: In a retrospective study, 41 patients were assigned to two groups containing one-stage primary ORIF (21patients) group, and two-stage group included external fixation and secondary ORIF (20 patients). The rate of infection(superficial or deep infection, osteomyelitis), malunion, nonunion, duration of hospital stay, neurovascular injury, painintensity, and patients’ satisfaction with AOFAS score, were compared between the two groups.Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in measured variables except hospital staywhich was significantly longer for the two-stage group.Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend using one stage ORIF for a patient with Pilon fractures type Cand Tscherne 1, 2 if the patient is planned to be operated on during the first 24 hours after the injury.Level of evidence: II
similar resources
Open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures.
The fracture of the tibial plafond or pilon fracture is an uncommon but difficult fracture to manage. The purpose of this study was to present the treatment outcomes of pilon fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation with
full textExternal Fixation combined with Limited Internal Fixation versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Treating Ruedi-Allgower Type III Pilon Fractures
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of type III pilon fractures remains controversial. Hence, we performed this study to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is superior to external fixations combined with limited internal fixations (EFLIF). MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2012 to October 2013, a total of 78 patients were included. Twenty-six patients underwent EFLIF...
full texttreatment of humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation
conclusions due to the shorter :union: time, to some extent less complication rate and comparable functional and clinical results, the authors recommend to use the mipo technique in treating the mid-distal humeral shaft fracture. results the median of :union: time was shorter in the mipo group (4 months versus 5 months). the time of surgery and functional outcomes based on the ucla and meps sco...
full textExternal fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial pilon fractures: A meta-analysis based on observational studies
PURPOSE Tibial pilon fractures remain challenging for an orthopaedic surgeon to repair. External fixation (ExFix) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are two widely used methods for repairing tibial pilon fractures. However, conclusions of comparative studies regarding which method is superior are controversial. Our aim is to compare ORIF and ExFix and clarify which method is better...
full textComparison of Arthroscopic Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Tibia Plateau Fracture Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study With Historical Controls
1Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 2Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Akhtar Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 3Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi Unive...
full textTreatment of anterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus by open reduction and internal fixation.
Over a seven-year period we treated a consecutive series of 58 patients, 20 men and 38 women with a mean age of 66 years (21 to 87) who had an acute complex anterior fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. Two patterns of injury are proposed for study based upon a prospective assessment of the pattern of soft-tissue and bony injury and the degree of devascularisation of the humeral head. ...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 6 issue 5
pages 0- 0
publication date 2018-09-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023