The Outcomes of Pilon Fracture Treatment: Primary Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Twostage Approach

Authors

  • Adel Ebrahimpour Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopaedic surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Amin Karimi Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopaedic surgery, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Amir Sharifzadeh Resident of orthopedic surgery,Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopedics surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohamad A. Okhovatpour Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopedics surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammadreza Minator sajjadi Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopaedic surgery, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Reza Zandi Taleghani hospital, research development unit, Department of orthopedics surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:

Background: Pilon fracture is one of the challenging injuries in orthopedic surgery. Associated soft tissue injury is animportant factor in choosing treatment options. Two major methods of treatment are considered as one-stage openreduction internal fixation (ORIF) and two-stage treatment (primary external fixation and secondary ORIF). The latter ismost accepted in literature. In the current study, we compared the results of these two methods.Methods: In a retrospective study, 41 patients were assigned to two groups containing one-stage primary ORIF (21patients) group, and two-stage group included external fixation and secondary ORIF (20 patients). The rate of infection(superficial or deep infection, osteomyelitis), malunion, nonunion, duration of hospital stay, neurovascular injury, painintensity, and patients’ satisfaction with AOFAS score, were compared between the two groups.Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in measured variables except hospital staywhich was significantly longer for the two-stage group.Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend using one stage ORIF for a patient with Pilon fractures type Cand Tscherne 1, 2 if the patient is planned to be operated on during the first 24 hours after the injury.Level of evidence: II

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures.

The fracture of the tibial plafond or pilon fracture is an uncommon but difficult fracture to manage. The purpose of this study was to present the treatment outcomes of pilon fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation with

full text

External Fixation combined with Limited Internal Fixation versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Treating Ruedi-Allgower Type III Pilon Fractures

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of type III pilon fractures remains controversial. Hence, we performed this study to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is superior to external fixations combined with limited internal fixations (EFLIF). MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2012 to October 2013, a total of 78 patients were included. Twenty-six patients underwent EFLIF...

full text

treatment of humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation

conclusions due to the shorter :union: time, to some extent less complication rate and comparable functional and clinical results, the authors recommend to use the mipo technique in treating the mid-distal humeral shaft fracture. results the median of :union: time was shorter in the mipo group (4 months versus 5 months). the time of surgery and functional outcomes based on the ucla and meps sco...

full text

External fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial pilon fractures: A meta-analysis based on observational studies

PURPOSE Tibial pilon fractures remain challenging for an orthopaedic surgeon to repair. External fixation (ExFix) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are two widely used methods for repairing tibial pilon fractures. However, conclusions of comparative studies regarding which method is superior are controversial. Our aim is to compare ORIF and ExFix and clarify which method is better...

full text

Comparison of Arthroscopic Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Tibia Plateau Fracture Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study With Historical Controls

1Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 2Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Akhtar Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 3Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi Unive...

full text

Treatment of anterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus by open reduction and internal fixation.

Over a seven-year period we treated a consecutive series of 58 patients, 20 men and 38 women with a mean age of 66 years (21 to 87) who had an acute complex anterior fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. Two patterns of injury are proposed for study based upon a prospective assessment of the pattern of soft-tissue and bony injury and the degree of devascularisation of the humeral head. ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 6  issue 5

pages  0- 0

publication date 2018-09-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023